cinriter ([info]cinriter) wrote,
@ 2008-07-16 08:41:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Halfcocked
(Please don't read this if you, for some insane reason, care about spoilers in relation to the movie Hancock. After all, I wouldn't want to be the one to ruin those astounding plot twists for you.)

So I saw this tripe movie Hancock last night. I went because I like Charlize Theron and had heard that she might become a superhero. She did. I liked those - oh, say - ten minutes of the movie. And don't get me wrong, I like Will Smith. But...

My God. If I turned in this script for one of my crappy little million-dollar movies, the producers would flay me alive.

There's basically not a single thing in here that makes sense. Really, not one. Right down to stuff like telling us that Jason Bateman is failing at his job, and then showing his house in the "valley" - and it's basically a two-million dollar home. Let's not even talk about that big plot twist, which renders the entire premise of the movie - Will Smith is a superhero - null and void by making him "mortal". And what kind of superhero is Hancock? Even after being reformed, this guy deals with one crisis situation by needlessly cutting off a man's hand and then being applauded by all the onlookers. Poor Theron is asked to deliver some of the most absurd and inexplicable dialogue in recent movie history, declaring her eternal love for one character while making googoo eyes at another. When she's revealed as a superhero, her appearance suddenly changes from sunny suburban soccer mom to rock babe, complete with Jack Sparrow's eye-liner and a leather outfit straight off the sales rack at Sluts R Us. Of course after telling Will Smith that she's "stronger", she conveniently spends the finale in a coma while he fights off the bad guys. At the end, she goes back to suburban soccer mom. I don't know about you, but if this woman was MY wife I'd be like, "Hey, honey - I think you need to be out there fighting a little crime!"

This is a script that works on NO level, and these guys probably made ten times more money than I've ever been paid for a movie. Now granted, maybe their first draft was flawlessly logical and they were victimized by hack rewriters...but when every single plot element is that critically flawed, it seems doubtful.

This reminds me of a conversation I once had with a producer of one of my films. I'd already told him I thought the movie was very bad, then one day we had a test screening which received some modest approval from the audience...and more than a few walk-outs. After the screening, the producer crowed to me about how much the remaining half of the audience liked it. My response, of course, was to remind him that we could have had a movie everyone would have liked, which would have made him even more money. He was honest enough to admit I was right

Too bad the producers of Hancock weren't even that smart.



(Post a new comment)


[info]glamberson
2008-07-16 04:31 pm UTC (link)
I was amazed to read that for years this was one of those "great" unproduced scripts. It must have really gone through a lot of rewriting.

(Reply to this)


[info]nick_kaufmann
2008-07-16 04:57 pm UTC (link)
Like Greg, I suspect this thing was tampered with by so many writers and marketing execs that it's probably unrecognizable from the original script.

(Reply to this)


[info]nihilistic_kid
2008-07-16 05:04 pm UTC (link)
I have an early draft of the script if you want to see it (it's just as bad, in a different way)

(Reply to this)


[info]rgrove
2008-07-16 07:04 pm UTC (link)
Good points, Lisa. What really kills me in your comments is the criminal mis-use of Charlize Theron (not to mention the stupid sexism in the script). Why the hell did she decide to do this film? I suppose it's good for her career to be opposite Mr. Money Will Smith, but still...They should have switched roles. It would have made the film a bit more interesting. After reading your comments, I think I need to watch "Monster" again.

(Reply to this)

Development Hell
[info]magicjoe
2008-07-16 09:35 pm UTC (link)
I've seen HANCOCK and read "Tonight, He Comes". There is not a single scene from the original spec in the final film. The story is different, the characters are different, the set-pieces are different, basically everything is different. Not a single scene. Really.

(Reply to this)

But...the butt!
(Anonymous)
2008-07-17 05:09 am UTC (link)
(No, not *that* scene!)

I wouldn't say cutting off the villain's hand was entirely needless, but then again, I was entertained by the first half of the picture, so there ya go.

What was the original script like? What was the story? And WHY did they hack it up so badly? :(

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…